ANTESEDEN DAN KONSEKUEN PEMBERDAYAAN PSIKOLOGIS PADA KARYAWAN START-UP DIGITAL INDONESIA KEPEMIMPINAN PEMBERDAYAAN DAN KREATIFITAS

Muhammad Ikhsan Alif, Agung Prabowo, Larasati Ahluwalia

Abstract


Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menjelaskan pengaruh antara kepemimpinan pemberdayaan pada kreatifitas sebagai anteseden dan konsekuen dari pemberdayaan psikologis. Penelitian ini berperan dalam mengisi kesenjangan kajian empiris dengan menjelaskan secara dinamis hubungan antara kepemimpinan pemberdayaan, kreatifitas, serta pemberdayaan psikologis. Karyawan pada Start-up Digital didominasi oleh generasi milenial yang merupakan generasi yang dikategorikan dengan generasi yang kreatif dan akrab dengan internet, kajian ini fokus pada diskusi terkait dengan pengaruh kepemimpinan pemberdayaan dan kreatifitas sebagai anteseden dan konsekuen dari pemberdayaan psikologis dengan kajian khusus terkait pemberdayaan. Studi akan menggunakan survei dengan obyek pada generasi milenial yang bekerja dibidang Start-up digital yang ada di Indonesia. Alat analisis akan menggunakan Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) dengan pendekatan Partial Least Square (PLS) untuk mengistimasi model penelitian

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amabile, T. M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10, p. 123.

Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2014). Empowering leadership : Construct clari fi cation , conceptualization , and validation of a new scale. The Leadership Quarterly.

Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2015). Linking Empowering Leadership to Job Satisfaction , Work Effort , and Creativity : The Role of Self-Leadership and Psychological Empowerment.

Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy machanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 1017–1028.

Bandura, Albert. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review1, 84(2), 191–215.

Bass, B. M., & Stogdill. (1990). Bass and Stogdil’s Handbook of Leadership (3rd ed.). new york: Free press.

Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life (2 edition). Routledge; (February 1, 1986).

Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R., & Wheatley, K. (2004). Social exchanges within organizations and work outcomes: The importance of local and global relationships. Group and Organization Management, 29(3), 276–301.

Brown, S. P., & Peterson, R. A. (1994). The effect of effort on sales performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 70–80.

Cheong, M., Yammarino, F. J., & Yun, S. (2016). Two faces of empowering leadership : Enabling and burdening. The Leadership Quarterly.

Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482.

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business Research Methods. In Business Research Methods.

Den Hartog, D. N., House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Antonio Ruiz-Quintanilla, S., Dorfman, P. W., Abdalla, I. A., … Zhou, J. (1999). Culture specific and crossculturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 219–252.

Dewettinck, K., & van Ameijde, M. (2011). Linking leadership empowerment behaviour to employee attitudes and behavioural intentions. Personnel Review, 40(3), 284–305.

Kim, M., Beehr, T. A., & Prewett, M. S. (2018). Employee Responses to Empowering Leadership : A Meta-Analysis.

King, M., & Bruner, G. (2000). Social Desirability Bias: A Neglected Aspect of Validity Testing. Psychology & Marketing, 17(2), 79–103.

Klerk, S. De, & Stander, M. W. (2014). Leadership Empowerment , Work Engagement And Turnover Intention : The Role Of Psychological. 5(3), 28–45.

Kock, N. (2018). WarpPLS User Manual Version 6.0 (6th ed.). Laredo, Texas: ScriptWarp System.

Kuvaas, B., & Dysvik, A. (2009). Perceived investment in employee development, intrinsic motivation and work performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(3), 217–236.

Spreitzer, G. M., Janasz, S. C. De, & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Empowered to Lead : The Role of Psychological Empowerment in Leadership Empowered to lead : the role of psychological empowerment in leadership. 20(4), 511–526.

Spreitzer, G. M., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace : dimensions , measurement , and validation. 38(5), 1442–1465.

Stone, D. N., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Beyond talk: Creating autonomous motivation through self-determination theory. Journal of General Management, 34(3), 75–91.

Suryana. (2003). Kewirausahaa, pedoman praktis kita dan proses menuju sukses (4th ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 24(5), dlo.2010.08124ead.007.

Zhang, X., & Zhou, J. (2014). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Empowering leadership , uncertainty avoidance , trust , and employee creativity : Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision, 124(2), 150–164




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/jeb.v2i2.116

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Published by Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia
Organized by Faculty of Economy and Business
Jl. Zainal Abidin Pagaralam, No.9-11, Labuhanratu, Bandarlampung, Indonesia
Telepon : 0721 70 20 22
W : https://jurnal.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/JEB/index
E : jeb@teknokrat.ac.id.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.